From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6379
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@cygnus.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: performance of fuzzy subject handling and killing threads
Date: 24 May 1996 16:58:58 -0400
Sender: raeburn@cygnus.com
Message-ID: <tx1ras9kctp.fsf@cygnus.com>
References: <9605241024.AA24364@cujo.cygnus.com> <x6k9y23wov.fsf@eyesore.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146842 3418 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:47:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:47:22 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA14862 for <steve@miranova.com>; Fri, 24 May 1996 14:34:25 -0700
Original-Received: from cygnus.com (cygnus.com [140.174.1.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <WAA17166@ifi.uio.no> ; Fri, 24 May 1996 22:59:16 +0200
Original-Received: from tweedledumb.cygnus.com (tweedledumb.cygnus.com [192.80.44.1]) by cygnus.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA29788; Fri, 24 May 1996 13:59:07 -0700
Original-Received: from cujo.cygnus.com by tweedledumb.cygnus.com (4.1/4.7) id AA08847; Fri, 24 May 96 16:59:00 EDT
Original-Received: by cujo.cygnus.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/20Sep95-0235PM)
	id AA15517; Fri, 24 May 1996 16:58:59 -0400
Original-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 24 May 1996 17:41:51 +0200
Original-Lines: 11
X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.83/Emacs 19.30
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6379
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6379


Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:

> Yes, I never use `k' myself.  (Well, I just use `M-C-l' to kill
> articles; what with the threading and gathering, it kills exactly the
> same articles that `k' does in a fraction of the time.)

Sounds good, but it's dependent on how gathering and score handling
are configured.  I'm not using scores at all, nor particularly
aggressive gathering.  For me, M-C-l put a "-" on the summary lines
for the thread, and moved me to the next article of that thread.