From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/55475 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ken Raeburn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: nnimap and crossposting (Re: Moving from nnml to nnimap...) Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 14:17:58 -0500 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87he0ur0yg.fsf@enki.rimspace.net> <4nisl9envb.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1073071117 8105 80.91.224.253 (2 Jan 2004 19:18:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 19:18:37 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M4015@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Jan 02 20:18:34 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AcUoc-0000xz-00 for ; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 20:18:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AcUoD-0003LK-00; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 13:18:09 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AcUo6-0003LE-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 13:18:02 -0600 Original-Received: from smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84F13A0061 for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 13:18:01 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from 216-15-127-174.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([216.15.127.174] helo=raeburn.org) by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4) id 1AcUo4-0006A6-00 for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 14:18:00 -0500 Original-Received: from kal-el.raeburn.org (mail@kal-el.raeburn.org [18.101.0.230]) by raeburn.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i02JI8k05569; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 14:18:08 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from raeburn by kal-el.raeburn.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AcUo3-00082P-00; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 14:17:59 -0500 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Ken Raeburn's message of "Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:01:53 -0500") Original-Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.1.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55475 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55475 The silence is deafening.... So, is no one actually using cross-posting when splitting articles in an nnimap server? My experimentation so far (playing with imtest, don't have the guest account and nnimap config set up yet) seems to indicate that the marks won't be propagated. If this is the case, I think it would be a good idea for the documentation to indicate this. (Actually, seen and expire are the only marks I really care about, if they're done any differently.) I wrote, in November: > I use crossposting a lot in my incoming mail splitting, though. > I want the messages marked for expiration in all groups at the same > time it's marked for expiration in one of the other groups. Do marks > get propagated for cross-posted articles in nnimap? Ken