From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8530 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ken Raeburn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: ELP (was Re: speedup in gnus-sum (B m command)) Date: 29 Oct 1996 22:35:47 -0500 Sender: raeburn@cygnus.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148676 12652 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:17:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "(ding) GNUS Mailing List" Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 27370 invoked from smtpd); 30 Oct 1996 03:57:48 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 30 Oct 1996 03:57:47 -0000 Original-Received: from cygnus.com (cygnus.com [140.174.1.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 04:42:38 +0100 Original-Received: from tweedledumb.cygnus.com (tweedledumb.cygnus.com [192.80.44.1]) by cygnus.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA05851; Tue, 29 Oct 1996 19:36:11 -0800 Original-Received: from cujo.cygnus.com by tweedledumb.cygnus.com (4.1/4.7) id AA14129; Tue, 29 Oct 96 22:35:50 EST Original-Received: by cujo.cygnus.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/20Sep95-0235PM) id AA09250; Tue, 29 Oct 1996 22:35:49 -0500 Original-To: David Moore In-Reply-To: David Moore's message of 26 Oct 1996 20:04:05 -0800 Original-Lines: 27 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.51/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8530 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8530 David Moore writes: > I'm also currently putzing around with changes to elp which > allow it to do full profiling (ie, call tree information) which might > help with gnus's strange oo-backend call traces. Before I write all of > this, has anyone on the list done something similar? (I've already > fixed elp to properly handle autoloads and keysequences making it > "safer" to use on gnus.) Great! I recently asked the same question in bug-gnu-emacs, and the answer appears to be "no", but I don't have the time to do the actual work right now. Some bits of information I got from the maintainer: * the correct email address for correspondence is tools-help@python.org, not the address used by M-x elp-submit-bug-report * the maintainer is "Barry A. Warsaw" but you should use the above email address, and he's got "little incentive (or time)" to work on this idea, but would welcome the contribution of code * a newer version of elp than either emacs-19.34 or xemacs has, version 2.37, is available, at http://www.python.org/ftp/emacs/; it has mostly bug fixes, some small new features; it's been submitted to rms too for future releases Ken