I just reproduced this again, so I know I'm not crazy: I have a thread with only one article showing. `A T' produces no change in the summary buffer. `^' will find the article's parent. Some articles on sibling branches in the thread are unreachable via `^', so I have to `/ o' to see them. When I do that, I can `^' up to their parent as before. What is going on with `A T'?? Thanks in advance, Dave -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> writes:
> I just reproduced this again, so I know I'm not crazy: I have a thread
> with only one article showing. `A T' produces no change in the
> summary buffer. `^' will find the article's parent.
What's the group, and what's the Message-ID of the article?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> writes:
>
>> I just reproduced this again, so I know I'm not crazy: I have a thread
>> with only one article showing. `A T' produces no change in the
>> summary buffer. `^' will find the article's parent.
>
> What's the group, and what's the Message-ID of the article?
It's my nnimap agentized INBOX. I've mostly seen this in my INBOX,
even when I wasn't using nnimap or the agent. I don't have the
message-id anymore but I doubt it would be much help to you, would it?
Thanks,
Dave
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> writes:
>>> I just reproduced this again, so I know I'm not crazy: I have a thread
>>> with only one article showing. `A T' produces no change in the
>>> summary buffer. `^' will find the article's parent.
>>
>> What's the group, and what's the Message-ID of the article?
>
> It's my nnimap agentized INBOX. I've mostly seen this in my INBOX,
> even when I wasn't using nnimap or the agent. I don't have the
> message-id anymore but I doubt it would be much help to you, would it?
Hm... I'm not all that familiar with the nnimap code myself. But
`A T' just fetches the headers, and that should be the same for any
backend. Or does nnimap do some magical re-mapping of Message-IDs?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> writes:
>
>>>> I just reproduced this again, so I know I'm not crazy: I have a thread
>>>> with only one article showing. `A T' produces no change in the
>>>> summary buffer. `^' will find the article's parent.
>>>
>>> What's the group, and what's the Message-ID of the article?
>>
>> It's my nnimap agentized INBOX. I've mostly seen this in my INBOX,
>> even when I wasn't using nnimap or the agent. I don't have the
>> message-id anymore but I doubt it would be much help to you, would it?
>
> Hm... I'm not all that familiar with the nnimap code myself. But
> `A T' just fetches the headers, and that should be the same for any
> backend. Or does nnimap do some magical re-mapping of Message-IDs?
Nope. Maybe A R works better? I may be seeing the same thing, at
least I frequently try a combination of A T, A R and ^ until I get
what I want, although I never investigated it.
Hi Simon, as you(?) suggested some time ago i summarized calling the three functions in a defun: ,---- | (defun cc-fetch-whole-thread() | "like `A R' `T o' `A T' in the summary buffer." | (interactive) | (gnus-summary-refer-references) | (gnus-summary-top-thread) | (gnus-summary-refer-thread)) | | (define-key gnus-summary-mode-map (kbd "AT") 'cc-fetch-whole-thread) `---- Beste Grüße, cu, -cc- -- Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. Pablo Picasso