From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/46635 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Niklas Morberg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Problem with lost marks Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:42:08 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1032770728 6674 127.0.0.1 (23 Sep 2002 08:45:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 08:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17tOqN-0001jW-00 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:45:27 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 17tOo4-0005DR-00; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 03:43:04 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 23 Sep 2002 03:43:42 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id DAA07410 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 03:43:33 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 22912 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2002 08:42:38 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 22903 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2002 08:42:38 -0000 Original-Received: from krynn.axis.se (193.13.178.10) by gnus.org with SMTP; 23 Sep 2002 08:42:38 -0000 Original-Received: from PCNIKLAS2 (dh10-13-8-243.axis.se [10.13.8.243]) by krynn.axis.se (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id g8N8g871023053 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:42:08 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 27 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-mingw-nt5.0.2195) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46635 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46635 Using a CVS gnus from last week I loose marks so often that it is annoying, but not often enough to be reproducible... It seems like I loose expireable marks, but things concerning readedness is still there. The unseen mark also shows up. I might not be making much sense, so here is an example: In an nnimap group some messages are read, some are unread and some are ticked. I mark some as expireable and exit the group. If I immediately enter the group again, all is well, but sooner or later something[1] happens that makes all messages be marked as unseen and the messages previously marked as expireable are now only marked as read. The read, unread and ticked messages have the correct marks (but the additional incorrect unseen mark). Is this happening to anybody else? What can I do to try to shed more light on the problem in order to solve it? Niklas Footnotes: [1] I really don't know what this is; it could be passage of time, entering and exiting other groups, catching up in another group or something else...