From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/23971 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Toby Speight Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: `nnmail-split-fancy' regexp Date: 07 Jul 1999 15:28:30 +0100 Organization: Citrix Systems (Cambridge) Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161606 6091 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:53:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA15673 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 10:36:04 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAB00061; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 09:32:40 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 07 Jul 1999 09:33:27 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA09821 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 09:33:13 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from ironside.ansa.co.uk (ironside.ansa.co.uk [192.5.254.44]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA15597 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 10:32:13 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from lanber.ansa.co.uk ([10.70.1.235]) by ironside.ansa.co.uk (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with ESMTP id AAA425; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 15:32:47 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 18 In-Reply-To: Alexandre Oliva's message of "Sun, 04 Jul 1999 21:18:44 GMT" X-Author-Info: Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23971 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23971 Alexandre> Alexandre Oliva 0> In , Alexandre 0> wrote: Alexandre> OTOH, it might break existing code that relies on the Alexandre> existing format. In this sense, `.*' would be better. Perhaps '*' might be best - a real regexp won't begin with '*', so the software can distinguish it from true regexps for the traditional splitter[1], and users won't be confused whether it's part of the regexp for \& purposes. [1] I have rules that require word boundaries at one end (like ".*@digitivity.com" to split work-related mail). I don't expect users with similar rules to have to change them (to ".*@digitivity.com\\>" in my case) because the magic prefix has changed Gnus's interpretation.