From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38310
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Typos...
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 12:42:59 +0200
Sender: aj@suse.de
Message-ID: <u8g0af5cgc.fsf@gromit.moeb>
References: <u8vgjcq69f.fsf@gromit.moeb>
	<ilur8tzkiuf.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
	<m3elpzak3f.fsf@SnowWhite.SuSE.cz>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174194 21687 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:23:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:23:14 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <aj@suse.de>
Return-Path: <aj@suse.de>
Original-Received: (qmail 18267 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2001 10:44:09 -0000
Original-Received: from mail.kdt.de (195.8.224.4)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 26 Aug 2001 10:44:09 -0000
Original-Received: from arthur.inka.de (arthur.kdt.de [195.8.250.5])
	by mail.kdt.de (8.11.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7QAi5016002
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 12:44:05 +0200
Original-Received: from gromit.moeb ([192.168.27.3] ident=postfix)
	by arthur.inka.de with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1)
	id 15axNd-00011R-00
	for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 12:43:01 +0200
Original-Received: by gromit.moeb (Postfix, from userid 207)
	id 0E7C21EA44; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 12:42:59 +0200 (CEST)
Mail-Copies-To: never
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <m3elpzak3f.fsf@SnowWhite.SuSE.cz> (Pavel@Janik.cz's message of
 "Sat, 25 Aug 2001 23:46:44 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Academic Rigor)
Original-Lines: 34
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38310
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38310

Pavel@Janik.cz (Pavel Jan=EDk) writes:

>    From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
>    Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 22:03:36 +0200
>
> Hi,
>
>    > > Interactive use seems to be faster now but bootstrapping takes
>    > > ages...
>    >=20
>    > It writes a few hundred bytes from memory to disk per group, that
>    > shouldn't hardly be noticable unless you have a very slow network fi=
le
>    > system or something.  Maybe something after the bootstrapping is
>    > taking time, and the bootstrapping message is still in the minibuffe=
r?
>
> I also tried the new code - bootstrapping is a pain. It took about a minu=
te
> on my machine (Celeron 550/128MB/~40 nnfolder groups). Startup of Gnus and
> each `g' takes about 15 seconds. I have all mails Gcc:'ed to nnfolder:
> groups where about 50MB+ of mails are stored. Can this be the cause? Why =
it
> is slower even on `g' (gnus-group-get-new-news)?

That's the same problem I notice.  'g' takes long.  I do have a number
of nnfolder groups and access them via NFS.  One has a size of 60 MB
and each 'g' seems to look at this file.  This might have been a
bootstrap problem (my partition was full) and since then I reverted to
an older gnus version.  Simon, does this make sense?  I'll try again
the newer version when I have time to wait for bootstrapping/'g',

Andreas
--=20
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj