From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/50045
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Niklas Morberg <niklas.morberg@axis.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: spam-stat broken?
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:49:39 +0100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <u8ywlrfpo.fsf@axis.com>
References: <ruofzr3tlb0.fsf@billwlx.wolfram.com>
	<4nwukeiy3c.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <ulm0u3gvn.fsf@axis.com>
	<4nr8amfwem.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu>
	<ufzqw8sfe.fsf_-_@axis.com> <uu1fbfd28.fsf@axis.com>
	<4nfzqur9al.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu>
	<4nk7g6tvdf.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045043348 373 80.91.224.249 (12 Feb 2003 09:49:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:49:08 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18itVo-00005S-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:49:04 +0100
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 18itXH-00014S-00; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 03:50:35 -0600
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 12 Feb 2003 03:51:33 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id DAA04270
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 03:51:22 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (qmail 5892 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2003 09:50:20 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 5887 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2003 09:50:19 -0000
Original-Received: from unknown (HELO krynn.axis.se) (212.209.10.216)
  by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 12 Feb 2003 09:50:19 -0000
Original-Received: from PCNIKLAS2 (dh10-13-8-244.axis.se [10.13.8.244])
	by krynn.axis.se (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id h1C9nd3O031766
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:49:40 +0100
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <4nk7g6tvdf.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> (Ted Zlatanov's
 message of "Tue, 11 Feb 2003 15:28:28 -0500")
Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.2
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50045
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:50045

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> Hm, I think I may have inadvertently fixed the problem :)

The move routines seem to be working better now, but after
some more testing I still see the problem with non-existing
messages being displayed in the summary buffer by the agent.

> I'm not sure if it's the right way to do it, but I now set the
> process-mark on every article that is to be moved, and then call
> gnus-summary-move-article.  It seems to work in my testing.

Is it really necessary to call g-s-m-a for every article?
Wouldn't it be more effective to first mark all articles
with the process mark and then call g-s-m-a once?

Niklas