* bad default for signencrypt with smime?
@ 2003-07-22 19:04 David S Goldberg
2003-07-31 1:05 ` Simon Josefsson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David S Goldberg @ 2003-07-22 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
According to C-h v, mml-signencrypt-style-alist now defaults to
combined for smime. However when I just tried to send a signed and
encrypted message to a colleague, I got the message that
Combined sign and encrypt S/MIME not support yet
which suggests that the default is broken.
Or is there a newer version of openssl available that supports it.
Thanks,
--
Dave Goldberg
david.goldberg6@verizon.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: bad default for signencrypt with smime?
2003-07-22 19:04 bad default for signencrypt with smime? David S Goldberg
@ 2003-07-31 1:05 ` Simon Josefsson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Simon Josefsson @ 2003-07-31 1:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: The Gnus Mailing List
David S Goldberg <david.goldberg6@verizon.net> writes:
> According to C-h v, mml-signencrypt-style-alist now defaults to
> combined for smime. However when I just tried to send a signed and
> encrypted message to a colleague, I got the message that
>
> Combined sign and encrypt S/MIME not support yet
>
> which suggests that the default is broken.
Indeed, I reverted my default value change, for S/MIME. Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-31 1:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-22 19:04 bad default for signencrypt with smime? David S Goldberg
2003-07-31 1:05 ` Simon Josefsson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).