From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/65315 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Zhang Wei Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Is this patch of gnus/pop3.el reasonable? Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:32:23 +0800 Message-ID: References: <85ir5r2302.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1191220361 13747 80.91.229.12 (1 Oct 2007 06:32:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 06:32:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ratinox@peorth.gweep.net, ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 01 08:32:38 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IcEpY-0005jb-U3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:32:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IcEpU-00084Z-UK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 02:32:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IcEpR-00080C-9s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 02:32:29 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IcEpP-0007wz-Kb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 02:32:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IcEpP-0007wj-GU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 02:32:27 -0400 Original-Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.232]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IcEpP-0003IL-BL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 02:32:27 -0400 Original-Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f1so2551378nzc for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:32:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:to:cc:subject:references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:x-posting-agent; bh=Rz80RHQqctX0QPXgw4MRZDeAvF/VKAxpou9N5Kjdqpk=; b=JhfuYQ6GWEnicFksiANk982B1HoYifcqkd3Cb2wbXxwU6z85/My5fOa2/LdytV1up6Gz96yCXMT86Y0VBrfNhJ9zX8FfGxWNuvy2Zx5UDQQLUoNGDDcMMRDLJVghGWEfELhZEYi8xkVlu2mzy6hqVUAHi8B4+nfznIZoYrF7Moc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:to:cc:subject:references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:x-posting-agent; b=iw51+l5q7g9f1a1UuhovvHeyplLfuEHWFnKxj5G8Dg2gNl6fHgaWkWZ8xyazakkSBHedQJXKpf1q+nMKNaxo/JDAtxNylvqgdjCxViNPRZDegHKyWNmWg7hv/UFGJ4ShwTx9Yd0+gLWkWe2GlHyc5Fy9frMkET9JFd8k9Cveh24= Original-Received: by 10.114.126.1 with SMTP id y1mr4062052wac.1191220345952; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:32:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from brephome ( [60.216.185.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v39sm7800452wah.2007.09.30.23.32.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:32:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (HELO BREPHOME) [127.0.0.1] by brephome (169.254.223.120) (userid 1) with ESMTP (Classic Hamster °æ±¾£º 2.1 °æ´Î 2.1.0.11) ; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:32:23 +0800 In-Reply-To: <85ir5r2302.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Mon\, 01 Oct 2007 00\:38\:05 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 X-Posting-Agent: Hamster/2.1.0.11 X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:80082 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65315 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > I am currently cleaning through unchecked changes in my Emacs tree. I > found that I have made the following change, presumably in order to > stop pop3 fetching from hanging in some cases with a possibly patchy > pop3 server. Could also be related to coding system translation or > something. The current version of pop3.el is quite different from that of xemacs, it still didn't support UIDL command, which is quite urgent to prevent gnus from fetching the same message repeatedly while messages are kept on the server.