From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/55689
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: [Regression] Why is my Summary buffer green?
Date: 05 Jan 2004 19:25:30 -0600
Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu
Message-ID: <ufa3catool1.fsf@epithumia.math.uh.edu>
References: <m3smix5jv7.fsf@c18072.rivrw2.nsw.optusnet.com.au>
	<87fzev7vpm.fsf@doohan.bang.priv.no>
	<m3r7ye7h0t.fsf@c18072.rivrw2.nsw.optusnet.com.au>
	<ufabrpi5smp.fsf@epithumia.math.uh.edu>
	<m3y8smlyh3.fsf@c18072.rivrw2.nsw.optusnet.com.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1073352360 8463 80.91.224.253 (6 Jan 2004 01:26:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 01:26:00 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M4229@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Jan 06 02:25:54 2004
Return-path: <ding-owner+M4229@lists.math.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Adfyj-0005hM-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 02:25:54 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 1AdfyS-0001Uf-00; Mon, 05 Jan 2004 19:25:36 -0600
Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 1AdfyO-0001Ua-00
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 05 Jan 2004 19:25:32 -0600
Original-Received: from epithumia.math.uh.edu (epithumia.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.2])
	by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A913A0026
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon,  5 Jan 2004 19:25:31 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from epithumia.math.uh.edu (epithumia.math.uh.edu [127.0.0.1])
	by epithumia.math.uh.edu (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i061PUlu011145;
	Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:25:30 -0600
Original-Received: (from tibbs@localhost)
	by epithumia.math.uh.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i061PUad011143;
	Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:25:30 -0600
Original-To: Malcolm Purvis <malcolmpurvis@optushome.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <m3y8smlyh3.fsf@c18072.rivrw2.nsw.optusnet.com.au>
Original-Lines: 22
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code)
Precedence: bulk
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55689
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55689

>>>>> "MP" == Malcolm Purvis <malcolmpurvis@optushome.com.au> writes:

MP> The problem wasn't with the timing of the approval but the format
MP> of the message once it had been approved.  I think that our
MP> mailing list software is mangling MIME messages in that case.

I do not believe that to be the case.  From the headers of the
original message as received by the list server:

Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 21:59:42 +1100
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1005 (Gnus v5.10.5) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion,
 linux)
Lines: 657
Message-ID: <m3smix5jv7.fsf@c18072.rivrw2.nsw.optusnet.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The list server software did not change the Content-Type of the
message; it was broken by the time it arrived here.

 - J<