From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24697 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason L Tibbitts III Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Ding News archiver Date: 16 Aug 1999 00:35:34 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035162218 10101 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:03:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA27448 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 01:37:23 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAB08921; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 00:33:05 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 16 Aug 1999 00:33:21 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA12979 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 00:33:11 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from epithumia.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.2]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA27361 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 01:32:18 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from tibbs@localhost) by epithumia.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA04775; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 00:35:34 -0500 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Jan Vroonhof's message of "15 Aug 1999 21:44:40 +0200" Original-Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070065 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.65) Emacs/20.3 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24697 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24697 >>>>> "JV" == Jan Vroonhof writes: JV> Would you please reconsider this? I like(d) it a lot. When they fix their problems I'll be happy to re-add the address. JV> P.S. Yes it was unreachable sometimes. If that is why you got bounces, JV> wouldn't it be possible to configure your MTA complain less about that? It is not why I received the bounces. I have quoted the bounces to the list previously; they were all errors from the mail-news gateway being sent to me instead of to someone who could have dealt with the problem. - J<