message.el and Supercite

message.el and Supercite

[Kai Grossjohann]

Hi all,

the following suffices to get Supercite running:

*** message.el.orig	Wed Mar 27 07:03:01 1996
--- message.el	Wed Mar 27 13:35:28 1996
***************
*** 842,848 ****
        (unless (bolp)
  	(insert ?\n))
        (unless modified
! 	(setq message-checksum (message-checksum))))))
  
  (defun message-insert-citation-line ()
    "Function that inserts a simple citation line."
--- 842,849 ----
        (unless (bolp)
  	(insert ?\n))
        (unless modified
! 	(setq message-checksum (message-checksum)))
!       (run-hooks 'message-cite-hook))))
  
  (defun message-insert-citation-line ()
    "Function that inserts a simple citation line."


In my .emacs file I have this:

(setq message-indent-citation-function nil)
(setq message-citation-line-function nil)
(add-hook 'message-cite-hook 'sc-cite-original)

Lars, are you going to put this into the distribution?

        kai
--
There ain't no cure for the summer time blues.

Re: message.el and Supercite

[Jason L Tibbitts III]

>>>>> "KG" == Kai Grossjohann <grossjoh@dusty.informatik.uni-dortmund.de> writes:

KG> (add-hook 'message-cite-hook 'sc-cite-original)

Shouldn't that be message-citation-hook?  That keeps with
mail-citation-hook and the documentation for message-remove-signature.

Ah, well, 0.60 is already out with cite-hook.
-- 
      Jason L. Tibbitts III - tibbs@uh.edu - 713/743-8684 - 221SR1
System Manager:  University of Houston High Performance Computing Center
                1994 PC800 "Kuroneko"      DoD# 1723

Re: message.el and Supercite

[Sam Hartman]

	I'm not sure I agree with dropping support for
mail-citation-hook.  It was a long time coming--I remember to bad old
days where you had to add about 20 lines to .emacs in order to get
Supercite to work with all the different packages out there.

	I'm wondering if changing the name of all the hooks but not
supporting the old names for backwards compatability is really
justified.

--Sam