From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12653
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Filling articles
Date: 21 Oct 1997 15:01:37 -0500
Message-ID: <ufayb3mlwbi.fsf@sina.hpc.uh.edu>
References: <0fhgas8cnw.fsf@heimdal.mjolner.dk> <0fiuv8gqex.fsf@frey.mjolner.dk> <m2k9fi8x1t.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <0fafgedqmx.fsf@frey.mjolner.dk> <m3k9f82lbk.fsf@sparky.gnus.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.100)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035152150 4941 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:15:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:15:50 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16])
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA08912
	for <steve@altair.xemacs.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 14:16:45 -0700
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA13122
	for <steve@xemacs.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 16:18:39 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (tibbs@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by ifi.uio.no (8.8.7/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with ESMTP id WAA10315
	for <ding@ifi.uio.no>; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 22:01:34 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: (from tibbs@localhost) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA22259; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 15:01:37 -0500 (CDT)
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 20 Oct 1997 23:09:35 +0200
Original-Lines: 12
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.46/Emacs 19.34
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12653
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12653

>>>>> "LMI" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

LMI> No, I just don't see the utility of this.  Point in the article buffer
LMI> can be anywhere -- unless you select the window, you won't know.  So
LMI> the command would fill a semi-random portion of the buffer...

WIBNI there were functions which, from the summary buffer, moved the point
in the article buffer.  It seems useless, but man do I really hate having to
C-xo all over the place to get to the article buffer so I can do some
little TM manipulation on it, then C-xo a few more times to get back.

 - J<