Re: spam.el and ham in a spam group

[Jody Klymak <jklymak@coas.oregonstate.edu>]

Hello Ted,

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, jklymak@coas.oregonstate.edu wrote:
>
>> That seems a little clumsy, so either I am missing something, *or*,
>> I'd suggest that items in my spam folder that I mark as non-spam
>> should be ham processed.  Is that possible?
>
> Currently it's not, because we only process ham in ham groups, but I
> can add a setting spam-process-ham-in-nonham-groups if you wish.

I guess that I would like that.  Well, unless leaving my Inbox as a
ham group and rehamming the messages over and over is not bad for
bogofilter.  Its certainly quick enough, so that is not a problem.

Here is another problem, and perhaps more important: I have my Inbox
set so that I do not see "old" (O) or "expired" (E) messages, only
"important" (!) ones.  Moving "read" (d) items from the spam folder
into the Inbox made them "old".  So, they do not show up in the
buffer.  I have to C-u into the group, mark the message as "important"
so that I can deal with it.

Can the "important" mark be made a ham mark?  Then I could mark
important items in my spam group, and have them moved to by Inbox.

Thanks,  Jody

-- 
Jody Klymak      http://mixing.coas.oregonstate.edu/people/jklymak/
mailto:jklymak@coas.oregonstate.edu