From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/26510
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Toby Speight <Toby.Speight@streapadair.freeserve.co.uk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: [OT] broken-reply-to
Date: 09 Nov 1999 16:27:38 +0000
Organization: Citrix Systems (Cambridge) <URL:http://citrix.com/>
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <uk8nreikl.fsf@lanber.cam.citrix.com>
References: <lz4sevy9sm.fsf@landlord.gbdirect.co.uk> <9t9u2mvvejj.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035163706 19782 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:28:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:28:26 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA18779
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 11:28:37 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAB00299;
	Tue, 9 Nov 1999 10:28:25 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 09 Nov 1999 10:28:36 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA00938
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 10:28:24 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from gatekeeper.ctxuk.citrix.com (root@gatekeeper.ctxuk.citrix.com [195.153.38.114])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA18769
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 11:27:46 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sh.ctxuk.citrix.com (sh.ctxuk.citrix.com [10.30.224.4]) by gatekeeper.ctxuk.citrix.com (8.8.7/BSCF-1.7) with ESMTP
	id QAA19201 for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 16:27:40 GMT
Original-Received: from hwmail01.ctxuk.citrix.com (hwmail01.ctxuk.citrix.com [10.30.224.23]) by sh.ctxuk.citrix.com (8.8.7/BSCF-1.7) with ESMTP
	id QAA12473 for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 16:27:40 GMT
Original-Received: from lanber.cam.citrix.com (LANBER [10.70.1.235]) by hwmail01.ctxuk.citrix.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0)
	id 45YDFBWP; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 16:27:39 -0000
Original-To: The Gnus Mailing List <ding@gnus.org>
Original-Lines: 16
In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of "09 Nov 1999 17:02:40 +0100"
X-Author-Info: <URL:http://www.ansa.co.uk/People/tms/>
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26510
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26510

Hrvoje> Hrvoje Niksic <URL:mailto:hniksic@iskon.hr>

0> In article <9t9u2mvvejj.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr>, Hrvoje wrote:

Hrvoje> Lee Willis <lee@gbdirect.co.uk> writes:

>> Can anyone provide me with a pointer to the discussion of why
>> mailing-lists shouldn't put in Reply-To headers.

Hrvoje> The document at <http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>
Hrvoje> sums it up pretty well.

To bring this on-topic for ding-list:

Should the documentation of the broken-reply-to parameter link to that
document (or a mirror of it on gnus.org)?