From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/52275 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Abrahams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Overbearing undownloaded face Date: Sun, 04 May 2003 19:10:39 -0400 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1052089820 17575 80.91.224.249 (4 May 2003 23:10:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 23:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M818@lists.math.uh.edu Mon May 05 01:10:15 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19CScY-0004ZD-00 for ; Mon, 05 May 2003 01:10:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19CSdm-0002UT-00; Sun, 04 May 2003 18:11:30 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19CSdi-0002UO-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 04 May 2003 18:11:26 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 74321 invoked by alias); 4 May 2003 23:11:26 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 74315 invoked from network); 4 May 2003 23:11:26 -0000 Original-Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net (207.172.4.60) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 4 May 2003 23:11:26 -0000 Original-Received: from 146-115-123-42.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([146.115.123.42] helo=PENGUIN.boost-consulting.com) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4) id 19CSdg-0006F5-00; Sun, 04 May 2003 19:11:24 -0400 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Simon Josefsson's message of "Sun, 04 May 2003 22:15:07 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52275 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52275 Simon Josefsson writes: > David Abrahams writes: > >> Simon Josefsson writes: >> >>> I sent a message asking for opinions about this a few months ago, but >>> now that I try to find my message, I note that it contained a screen >>> shot so it was probably rejected due to size. So: Opinions? >> >> I'm likin' it, though I don't exactly understand what the effect was. > > For me, it makes unread (and ticked, and ...) articles black instead > of a green-blue-ish (undownloadable mark) color which looks almost > identical to the green-blue-ish color which is used for read messages. That's what it does for me, too. What I meant was I'm not sure what it's doing *technically*. If moving those Sexprs down makes them ineffectual, can't they be eliminated? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com