From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54847 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jody Klymak Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam.el: automatically resplitting ham in a spam group? Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:57:52 -0800 Organization: Ocean Mixing Group, Oregon State U. Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <4nfzgkdqzx.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1069275491 10712 80.91.224.253 (19 Nov 2003 20:58:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3387@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Nov 19 21:58:08 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AMZOq-0003qh-00 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 21:58:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AMZOd-0005fh-00; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:57:56 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AMZOZ-0005fc-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:57:51 -0600 Original-Received: from dnsman.oce.orst.edu (dnsman.OCE.ORST.EDU [128.193.64.33]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFA53A0047 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:57:50 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from PENDER.mail.oce.orst.edu (pender.OCE.ORST.EDU [128.193.65.180]) by dnsman.oce.orst.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id MAA25230 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:57:48 -0800 (PST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: )UPEGs@hZ!Z_j0LNZv0Uu\k (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Wed, 19 Nov 2003 15:48:18 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54847 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54847 Hello Ted, Ted Zlatanov writes: > By the way, recently I added multiple spam/ham-process-destinations. > So now from a spam group, you can send ham to "INBOX" and to a > "train_ham" group. I find that very useful for training, since > "train_ham" will only contain the misclassified messages. With your > setup, you may like it too. What is the rationale behind this? Do you do the training on the mail server? I train locally using bogofilter, and have found simply training on misclassified messages to work quite well. ie. only train on spam in my ham group and only on ham in my spam group. So I have been curious about these train_ham and train_spam groups. Thanks, Jody -- Jody Klymak http://mixing.coas.oregonstate.edu/people/jklymak/ mailto:jklymak@coas.oregonstate.edu