Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Waldherr <swa@cs.cmu.edu>
Subject: Gnus bugs and some annoyances ...
Date: 11 Jan 1998 12:47:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <upkoh1i9a3m.fsf@mind.learning.cs.cmu.edu> (raw)

Hi,

I think that there are some flaws the way gnus handles it's article
numbers. Moving articles from one group to the other does not always have the
expected results. Consider this:

   `M-x gnus RET' to start gnus
   Enter folder `swa'
   Mark all articles with `#' (say 2 0 0 #)
   `B m temp RET' to move all mails to nnml:temp
   `c' to catchup
   `j nnml:temp RET' to jump to nnml:temp
   `RET' on the `nnml:temp' line yields `Can't select group'
   This is bug #1 (nnml:temp was not created by the moving process -- it
   existed before).

   `q' to quit gnus
   `M-x gnus RET' to start gnus
   Oops, `nnml:temp' shows x new messages.
   I enter the group and hit `c' to catchup.
   I mark all articles again with `#' and move it back to `swa'.
   Now the articles numbers start with >> 1. I would have expected,
   that they start with 1, since the group is empty.
   This is bug #2.

   Weird is at this point, that I can enter `swa' and find the 
   articles there (remember I couldn't do it the other way round).

Also I grepped thru dejanews and found that other people were wondering about
this: the way gnus determines the number of articles with maxn-minn isn't
particular smart since you could have deleted some articles in between. Is
there a particular reason why the number of articles are determined that way?
It is annoying because I have one folder with four mails and -- you might have
guessed it --- with very high article numbers. Now, any time I enter this
folder, gnus asks me `How many articles...'? MH has a nice feature where you
can pack folder (pack as in renumber all articles so that there is no gap in
the sequence of numbers). Could such a thing be of use for gnus?

Another issue is gnus speed: from time to time I'm simply waiting too long for
gnus to do something. For example: slurping mail. `nnml: Reading incoming
mail...'  stays in the message buffer for quite some time. Is there some code
that can be cleaned up wrt incorporating mail? Do other people experience such
delays?

--Stefan
-- 
Stefan Waldherr                office +1 (412) 268-3837
                                  fax +1 (412) 268-5576
                               e-Mail swa@cs.cmu.edu
                                  www http://www.waldherr.org/


             reply	other threads:[~1998-01-11 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1998-01-11 17:47 Stefan Waldherr [this message]
1998-01-11 18:17 ` Aaron M. Ucko
1998-01-11 19:54 ` Lars Balker Rasmussen
1998-01-12  0:26   ` Ken Raeburn
1998-01-12  2:36 ` Justin Sheehy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=upkoh1i9a3m.fsf@mind.learning.cs.cmu.edu \
    --to=swa@cs.cmu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).