Re: follow-up & CC

[Sam Steingold <sds@gnu.org>]

> * Reiner Steib <4.hpr.03.e.f@aheshrefcnz.qr> [2003-11-10 18:44:26 +0100]:
>
> On Mon, Nov 10 2003, Sam Steingold wrote:
>
> [ C-h f message-insert-to RET ]
>> I would like to add this function to `message-setup-hook', but it
>> signals an error for people who do not want copies.
>> Wouldn't it be better to use this instead?
> [...]
>>     (when dont
>>       (if force
>>         (warn "Ignoring the user request not to have copies sent via mail")
>>         (warn "Complying with the user request not to have copies sent via mail")))
>
> `warn' isn't available in Emacs 21.3, so we cannot use it (Gnus 5.10
> is supposed to run on Emacs 20.7 and up).

yeah, `warn' is actually no good, I replaced it with `message', but
`gnus-message' is even better.

> But we could use something like this:
>
>     (when dont
>       (if force
> 	  (gnus-message
> 	   1 "Ignoring the user request not to have copies sent via mail.")
>         (gnus-message 3 (concat "Complying with the user request "
> 				"not to have copies sent via mail.")))
>       (sit-for 1))

why sit-for?

Do you have gnus write access?
Can you check this in?

Thanks.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k
<http://www.camera.org> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://www.memri.org/>
<http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.honestreporting.com>
Why do we want intelligent terminals when there are so many stupid users?