From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24818 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Toby Speight Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: mm-bidy-7-or-8 seems bogus to me [pgnus 0.95] Date: 27 Aug 1999 10:40:57 +0100 Organization: Citrix Systems (Cambridge) Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <86k8qh3nkd.fsf@polo.overx.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035162319 10824 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:05:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA12077 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 10:26:58 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAB22178; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 09:24:53 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 27 Aug 1999 04:42:02 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA03831 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 04:41:52 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from ironside.ansa.co.uk (ironside.ansa.co.uk [192.5.254.44]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA07538 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 05:41:03 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from lanber.cam.citrix.com (LANBER.ansa.co.uk [10.70.1.235]) by ironside.ansa.co.uk (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with ESMTP id AAA418; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 10:41:52 +0100 Original-To: The Gnus Mailing List Original-Lines: 11 In-Reply-To: Soren Dayton's message of "26 Aug 1999 22:33:06 -0500" X-Author-Info: Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24818 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24818 Soren> Soren Dayton 0> In article <86k8qh3nkd.fsf@polo.overx.com>, Soren wrote: Soren> Perhaps this should be "\001-\177" or even something like Soren> "\027-\177". What do people think? I think the latter is not a very good idea - I'd go more for something more, like "\011\012\015\027-\177" to allow TAB, LF, and CR in ASCII. \014 (FF) is probably okay, too. Some other characters require thought (ESC?).