From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/63905 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: `.newsrc.eld' saves chinese group name in wrong coding Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:28:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87mz7tm2wn.fsf@furball.mit.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162031342 31662 80.91.229.2 (28 Oct 2006 10:29:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:29:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, yamaoka@jpl.org, id.brep@gmail.com, ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m12432@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Oct 28 12:28:56 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdlQt-00018V-Q6 for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:28:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1GdlQo-0001X4-00; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 05:28:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1GdlQj-0001Wz-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 05:28:45 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GdlQg-0003K0-V3 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 05:28:45 -0500 Original-Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.20]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1GdlQf-000201-00 for ; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:28:41 +0200 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-238-159.inter.net.il [84.229.238.159]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id FAL72572 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:28:04 +0200 (IST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:33:35 -0400) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:63905 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:14812 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > CC: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, > yamaoka@jpl.org, id.brep@gmail.com, ding@gnus.org > Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:33:35 -0400 > > > There is a big difference between unibyte strings and encoded unibyte > > strings. > > What is that difference? > > You can represent one of Emacs' supported Latin alphabets in > (unencoded) unibyte strings, and Emacs will automatically convert to > and from multibyte. AFAIK, Latin-N unibyte strings and iso-8859-N text encoded in Latin-N use the same numerical codes for the same characters, so they are indistinguishable. Handa-san, am I right?