From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/48525 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Arnd Kohrs Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: nnimap: moving bugs Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 00:40:51 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1041464477 32362 80.91.224.249 (1 Jan 2003 23:41:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 23:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18TsU8-0008Pq-00 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 00:41:16 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18TsUK-00047W-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 17:41:28 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 01 Jan 2003 17:42:22 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA21279 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 17:42:09 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 55320 invoked by alias); 1 Jan 2003 23:41:10 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 55315 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2003 23:41:10 -0000 Original-Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr (213.228.0.176) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 1 Jan 2003 23:41:10 -0000 Original-Received: from CASTIFY152 (nice-1-a7-62-147-124-251.dial.proxad.net [62.147.124.251]) by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95BAC054; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 00:40:59 +0100 (CET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Mailer: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-msvc-nt5.0.2195) Original-Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-msvc-nt5.0.2195) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:48525 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:48525 Hi, when manually moving articles in the summary buffer from one imap group to another on the same server I noticed - the tick-mark which is removed before moving reappears on the article in the target group. (I guess marks of the article are not saved before moving). - the article is downloaded (including the attachments), though I thought that it would technically not be necessary since the article is only moved in the imap-server Cheers, Arnd.