From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/73218
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: $ collision
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:33:25 +0200
Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net
Message-ID: <uueibo6jlm.fsf@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <m3lj5wgbcd.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287387257 12828 80.91.229.12 (18 Oct 2010 07:34:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:34:17 +0000 (UTC)
To: ding@gnus.org
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M21590@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Oct 18 09:34:15 2010
Return-path: <ding-owner+M21590@lists.math.uh.edu>
Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org
Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M21590@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1P7kEZ-0007n2-Ii
	for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:34:15 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M21590@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1P7kDz-0004fh-42; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:33:39 -0500
Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33])
	by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <postmaster@quimby.gnus.org>)
	id 1P7kDv-0004fH-14
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:33:35 -0500
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51])
	by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <postmaster@quimby.gnus.org>)
	id 1P7kDp-0002bK-U6
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:33:34 -0500
Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1P7kDo-0003fo-00
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:33:28 +0200
Original-Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so412431bwz.17
        for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:organization
         :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version
         :content-type;
        bh=GBQca5w31AI9AGGpi7I6vjaOvuYqfchDttE5xeAvxpk=;
        b=DwO7EhEEZb2PnAuuDQf+HKLS03Y3qgfmT4F3KDRonkmmEAg3+Eg0qOaFQtNFCT8ZnN
         sqIYRx/5g3g0dnJ8sueiEE4vnNTFOv4Z32EqERBr//Kfy3ltR39CZcNejVjEDZ2R8KZQ
         e2mQNnoMAbrRPX1lRXXTXKeFuJvbHpacUhZKg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:to:subject:organization:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id
         :user-agent:mime-version:content-type;
        b=aW3p/dlni6wfZVWLcH+9ByJUfLM66kX86AlcE8g0hzXZTuT4F43rSdIQb2A5joxGWv
         vU/anaIV2cB/gbR3WDKdRwfsg8wBewmvNQlSyuYT2RGwCNLsiXyt/ovYq8Z08cOrRGf+
         mq4dn3jY/yG3f7DxyzY974XopZHZkEAgrtMew=
Original-Received: by 10.204.118.138 with SMTP id v10mr666124bkq.99.1287387207725;
        Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x13sm16589967bki.12.2010.10.18.00.33.26
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:33:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m3lj5wgbcd.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's
	message of "Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:09:22 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--)
List-ID: <ding.gnus.org>
Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:73218
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/73218>

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> I recently bound `$' to `gnus-summary-mark-as-spam', but nnmairix uses
> this command for its keymap.
>
> So we either have to remove the `gnus-summary-mark-as-spam' binding, or
> more the nnmairix keys somewhere else.  Thoughts?

Is M-d not the standard for mark as spam? Why another binding that
causes conflicts?