From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8581
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: dubach1@husc.harvard.edu (Joev Dubach)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: nnmail-delete-incoming
Date: 04 Nov 1996 01:23:11 -0500
Message-ID: <uufpw1unzu8.fsf@fas.harvard.edu>
Reply-To: dubach1@husc.harvard.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148728 13011 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:18:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:18:48 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: (qmail 26776 invoked from smtpd); 4 Nov 1996 06:42:37 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 4 Nov 1996 06:42:36 -0000
Original-Received: from husc.harvard.edu (root@husc-31.harvard.edu [140.247.31.45]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <HAA06230@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@IFI.UIO.NO> ; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 07:23:14 +0100
Original-Received: from fas.harvard.edu by husc.harvard.edu with SMTP id BAA19558; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 01:23:11 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: by fas.harvard.edu; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/16Sep96-0158AM)
	id AA15653; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 01:23:11 -0500
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
Original-Lines: 18
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.53/Emacs 19.34
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8581
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8581

I'm just now trying out Red Gnus 0.53, after having used Gnus 5.3 for
quite a while, and I noticed that the default value of
nnmail-delete-incoming has changed from t to nil (which caused some
extra space consumption until I noticed it.)

Is this intentional, as a safeguard during alpha times?  (And, if so,
why not let the hardy alpha-users set it to "safe" mode themselves if
they're afraid to lose a little mail? :) )  In any case, it should
probably be changed back before beta release, IMO.

Joev                          <URL:"http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~dubach1/">

  "<flame> Perhaps you haven't <heavy ironic overstatement> quite
   <\overstatement> noticed, but you're writing <dinosaur> USENET
   <\dinosaur> articles and not publishing on the <trumpets> <chorus of
   angels> World Wide Web, so please hold the HTML for a more
   appropriate medium.  <\flame>"
          -- Geoff Langdale