* Problem Moving Ham from Spam
@ 2003-11-03 14:56 Jake Colman
2003-11-03 16:13 ` Jody Klymak
2003-11-03 16:58 ` Michael Shields
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jake Colman @ 2003-11-03 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
I thought I had this all worked out but it didn't quite work out right.
My spam group has the following group parameters set:
((uidvalidity . "71437")
(timestamp 16294 26744)
(auto-expire . t)
(registry-ignore . t)
(spam-contents gnus-group-spam-classification-spam)
(spam-process
(gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter))
(ham-process-destination . "nnimap+hamilton:INBOX/Misc")
(expiry-wait . 2))
I also set the global variable
spam-mark-ham-unread-before-move-from-spam-group to true.
I entered the group and tickeed ("!") those messages that were really ham. I
did a 'c' on the group and watched it all chug away expecting to have my ham
moved to the INBOX/Misc folder marked unread. Instead, the ticked messages
remained as ticked messages in my spam folder and did not get moved.
Two questions:
1) What did I do wrong? Do I need to specify the ham-marks group parameter
for this to work? I didn't think so since the tick mark shold be
comnsidered a ham mark by default, no?
2) How do I fix this now? I want the ticked messages to be trained as ham
and moved. Do I just move them manually to my ham group and let them get
trained by the ham group's exit processor?
--
Jake Colman
Principia Partners LLC Phone: (201) 209-2467
Harborside Financial Center Fax: (201) 946-0320
902 Plaza Two E-mail: colman@ppllc.com
Jersey City, NJ 07311 www.principiapartners.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Problem Moving Ham from Spam
2003-11-03 14:56 Problem Moving Ham from Spam Jake Colman
@ 2003-11-03 16:13 ` Jody Klymak
2003-11-03 16:58 ` Michael Shields
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jody Klymak @ 2003-11-03 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
Jake Colman <colman@ppllc.com> writes:
> I also set the global variable
> spam-mark-ham-unread-before-move-from-spam-group to true.
>
> I entered the group and tickeed ("!") those messages that were really ham. I
> did a 'c' on the group and watched it all chug away expecting to have my ham
> moved to the INBOX/Misc folder marked unread. Instead, the ticked messages
> remained as ticked messages in my spam folder and did not get moved.
This all works fine for me, except I have
spam-mark-ham-unread-before-move-from-spam-group set to nil.
> Two questions:
>
> 1) What did I do wrong? Do I need to specify the ham-marks group
> parameter for this to work? I didn't think so since the tick mark
> shold be comnsidered a ham mark by default, no?
Maybe it should, but I doubt that it is. I asked Ted to have it added
to the customize list. I don't think it is enabled by "default". Are
any marks enabled by default? What happens if you actually try to set
it?
> 2) How do I fix this now? I want the ticked messages to be trained
> as ham and moved. Do I just move them manually to my ham group and
> let them get trained by the ham group's exit processor?
No, you shouldn't need to move them manually. They will get moved...
Cheers, Jody
--
Jody Klymak http://mixing.coas.oregonstate.edu/people/jklymak/
mailto:jklymak@coas.oregonstate.edu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Problem Moving Ham from Spam
2003-11-03 14:56 Problem Moving Ham from Spam Jake Colman
2003-11-03 16:13 ` Jody Klymak
@ 2003-11-03 16:58 ` Michael Shields
2003-11-03 19:01 ` Ted Zlatanov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Shields @ 2003-11-03 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ding
In message <76brrtwle3.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com>,
Jake Colman <colman@ppllc.com> wrote:
> 1) What did I do wrong? Do I need to specify the ham-marks group parameter
> for this to work? I didn't think so since the tick mark shold be
> comnsidered a ham mark by default, no?
No. The default ham marks are:
:variable-default '((".*" ((gnus-del-mark
gnus-read-mark
gnus-killed-mark
gnus-kill-file-mark
gnus-low-score-mark))))
I don't think tick should be a default ham mark, because the tick mark
is not reset when leaving the group. Many people use ticked articles
as a way of temporarily saving them, and it would be incorrect to copy
them to ham groups every time the group is exited.
> 2) How do I fix this now? I want the ticked messages to be trained as ham
> and moved. Do I just move them manually to my ham group and let them get
> trained by the ham group's exit processor?
Manually? That implies that Emacs could not do it for you. No, add
tick to the ham-marks if you want, or use 'd' instead of '!' to rescue
ham from spam groups.
--
Shields.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Problem Moving Ham from Spam
2003-11-03 16:58 ` Michael Shields
@ 2003-11-03 19:01 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2003-11-03 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Jake Colman, ding
On Mon, 03 Nov 2003, shields@msrl.com wrote:
> In message <76brrtwle3.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com>,
> Jake Colman <colman@ppllc.com> wrote:
>> 1) What did I do wrong? Do I need to specify the ham-marks group
>> parameter for this to work? I didn't think so since the tick
>> mark shold be comnsidered a ham mark by default, no?
>
> No. The default ham marks are:
>
> :variable-default '((".*" ((gnus-del-mark
> gnus-read-mark
> gnus-killed-mark
> gnus-kill-file-mark
> gnus-low-score-mark))))
>
> I don't think tick should be a default ham mark, because the tick
> mark is not reset when leaving the group. Many people use ticked
> articles as a way of temporarily saving them, and it would be
> incorrect to copy them to ham groups every time the group is exited.
Agreed, that's why it's not in the defaults. Jake, sorry if I
implied or said that it was a default. It was intentionally not a
default so it wouldn't interfere with most people's reading habits.
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-11-03 19:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-11-03 14:56 Problem Moving Ham from Spam Jake Colman
2003-11-03 16:13 ` Jody Klymak
2003-11-03 16:58 ` Michael Shields
2003-11-03 19:01 ` Ted Zlatanov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).