From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18513 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Welsh Duggan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Ticked articles cached? Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 17:09:03 GMT Organization: Carnegie Mellon University : KANTOO Project Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157023 6534 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:37:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA02132 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 12:10:09 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAB16589; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 11:09:49 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 11 Nov 1998 11:09:45 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA10482 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 11:09:34 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (sunsite.auc.dk [130.225.51.30]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA02117 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 12:09:26 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (qmail 17318 invoked by uid 509); 11 Nov 1998 17:09:22 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: emacs.ding Original-Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070042 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.42) Emacs/20.3 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.2.110.42 Original-X-Complaints-To: news@sunsite.auc.dk Original-X-Trace: sunsite.auc.dk 910804143 128.2.110.42 (Wed, 11 Nov 1998 18:09:03 MET DST) Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 18:09:03 MET DST Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:18513 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:18513 I seem to recall that in the past, ticked articles were automatically cached. I have depended on that fact in the past, but recently I have received evidence that this might not be the case (any more?). I actually like the idea that ticked articles are automatically cached. Is there any way to make this behaviour standard? -- Michael Duggan (md5i@cs.cmu.edu) .