a little question ...

a little question ...

[PISTORI David]

Hello,

scuse me, but i wanted to ask you, if you know where can i find a 
gnu gcc compiler for dos or windows ...

or if you have it , send me .... please !

thanks Bye...

Re: a little question ...

[Wes Hardaker]

>>>>> On Thu, 22 Oct 1998 19:30:45 +0100, "PISTORI David" <HT@hol.fr> said:

PISTORI> scuse me, but i wanted to ask you, if you know where can i find a 
PISTORI> gnu gcc compiler for dos or windows ...

I think Lars is in the process of re-writting the gcc compiler using elisp...

-- 
"Ninjas aren't dangerous.  They're more afraid of you than you are of them."

Re: a little question ...

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Wes Hardaker <wjhardaker@ucdavis.edu> writes:

> I think Lars is in the process of re-writting the gcc compiler using
> elisp...

I'm writing the Elisp interpreter in Java, though, but first I have to
write the JVMEGCC environment in Fortran.  (Right after I install the
egcs g77 frontend.)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Re: a little question ...

[Dave Love]

>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

 Lars> I'm writing the Elisp interpreter in Java, though, but first I
 Lars> have to write the JVMEGCC environment in Fortran.  (Right after
 Lars> I install the egcs g77 frontend.)

I don't think g77 is really up to the job currently (though it was
once traditional to write Lisp and similar systems in FORTRAN, not to
mention the occasional OS); you probably want to get going on g95
development initially.

-- 
GNU Fortran -- It's free crunch time.

Re: a little question ...

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk> writes:

> I don't think g77 is really up to the job currently (though it was
> once traditional to write Lisp and similar systems in FORTRAN, not to
> mention the occasional OS); you probably want to get going on g95
> development initially.

Yeah; you're right.  But I've been thinking about rewriting gcc itself
in Scheme, but I first have to write a Scheme compiler in Perl.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Re: a little question ...

[Dave Love]

>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

 Lars> But I've been thinking about rewriting gcc itself in Scheme,
 Lars> but I first have to write a Scheme compiler in Perl.

OTOH perhaps you could write it in Emacs Lisp.

[I wish GCC really was written in Lisp, of course.]

Re: a little question ...

[Carl R. Witty]

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk> writes:
> 
> > I don't think g77 is really up to the job currently (though it was
> > once traditional to write Lisp and similar systems in FORTRAN, not to
> > mention the occasional OS); you probably want to get going on g95
> > development initially.
> 
> Yeah; you're right.  But I've been thinking about rewriting gcc itself
> in Scheme, but I first have to write a Scheme compiler in Perl.

OK, it's not Scheme, but there is a (toy) Lisp interpreter written in
Perl.  This is especially appropriate for this mailing list since the
project started as a reader for .newsrc.eld files.

You can check it out at:
 http://www.cpan.org/authors/Gisle_Aas/perl-lisp-0.05.tar.gz

Carl Witty
cwitty@newtonlabs.com