* Re: [PATCH] gnus-group-suspend should not kill sticky article buffer?
[not found] <87fxsb9j10.fsf@redflag-linux.com>
@ 2008-05-22 11:01 ` Reiner Steib
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Reiner Steib @ 2008-05-22 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding; +Cc: Wang Diancheng, bugs
On Wed, May 21 2008, Wang Diancheng wrote:
> if need, This is the patch:
>
> --- gnus-group.el~ 2008-05-06 17:17:25.000000000 +0800
> +++ gnus-group.el 2008-05-21 23:38:13.000000000 +0800
> @@ -4406,7 +4406,9 @@
> (unless (or (eq buf group-buf)
> (eq buf gnus-dribble-buffer)
> (with-current-buffer buf
> - (eq major-mode 'message-mode)))
> + (eq major-mode 'message-mode))
> + (with-current-buffer buf
> + (eq major-mode 'gnus-sticky-article-mode)))
> (gnus-kill-buffer buf)))
> (setq gnus-backlog-articles nil)
> (gnus-kill-gnus-frames)
Thanks for your patch.
I never use `gnus-group-suspend', but keeping sticky article buffers
seems to make sense. What do people think? If we add this patch, the
doc string of `gnus-group-suspend' and the manual (info "(gnus)Exiting
Gnus") need to be adjusted.
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-05-22 11:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <87fxsb9j10.fsf@redflag-linux.com>
2008-05-22 11:01 ` [PATCH] gnus-group-suspend should not kill sticky article buffer? Reiner Steib
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).