From: Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de>
Subject: Re: editing drafts
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:15:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <v93cbrcuem.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <r87bj07u.fsf@random.localnet.unwireduniverse.com>
On Tue, May 06 2003, Derrell.Lipman@UnwiredUniverse.com wrote:
> kai.grossjohann@gmx.net (Kai Großjohann) writes:
[...]
>> Okay, I agree with Reiner now: let's use B w for
>> gnus-summary-edit-article, and D e for the draft function, and e has
>> dwimish behavior.
>
> Just to add one more voice to the ruckus...
>
> Although I've become quite used to 'D e' for the draft function, I
> still find it uncomfortable to not be able to just press 'e' for
> this purpose. I don't mind 'D e' staying how it is, but I'd prefer
> that 'e' run the same function as 'D e'.
[See <URL:http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/52308> for
the complete thread.]
It seems that we agreed on this change, but nobody actually did it. I
will add the `e' binding, unless there are objections.
Thus, in Drafts mode, we'll have:
`e' and `D e' -> gnus-draft-edit-message
`B w' -> gnus-summary-edit-article
Should `e' be added and advertised in (info "(gnus)Drafts") too or is
it better to mention only `D e' there?
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- PGP key available via WWW http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-11 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-05 14:37 Kai Großjohann
2003-05-05 14:51 ` Emerick Rogul
2003-05-05 15:52 ` Reiner Steib
2003-05-07 7:28 ` Michael R. Wolf
2003-05-05 16:02 ` Karl Pflästerer
2003-05-05 19:58 ` Xavier Maillard
2003-05-06 16:32 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-05-06 20:20 ` Derrell.Lipman
2003-05-06 22:29 ` Xavier Maillard
2003-12-11 14:15 ` Reiner Steib [this message]
2003-12-18 21:07 ` Reiner Steib
2003-12-31 2:38 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-12-31 10:29 ` Reiner Steib
2003-05-07 7:27 ` Michael R. Wolf
2003-05-13 17:37 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-05-13 17:38 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-05-14 20:00 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-10-18 13:47 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=v93cbrcuem.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de \
--to=4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de \
--cc=reiner.steib@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).