On Tue, May 10 2005, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Reiner Steib wrote:
>
>> the display of message/rfc822 parts in Loom is broken
>
> Another odddity: start (dito for end).
I'd vote for disabling the strikethru decoration feature. It produces
by far more false positives than intended decorations.
>
>
> The original article has a third text/plain inline part
> with a MIME-version: 1.0 header field. So far I thought
> that a part has zero or more Content- header fields,
> but not its very own MIME-version. Most probably it's
> perfectly legal, I've just not seen it anywhere before.
The "MIME-Version" header was inserted by Gnus on sending (not present
in the message buffer). I don't know if it should be there. -->
Cc-ing ding. `message-forward-as-mime' is t.
,----[
|