From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/59329 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: @code{spam.el} vs. @file{spam.el} Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:10:47 +0100 Organization: Dept. of Theoretical Physics, University of Ulm Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1102021905 4529 80.91.229.6 (2 Dec 2004 21:11:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:11:45 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M7869@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Dec 02 22:11:38 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13] ident=mail) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CZyEj-0004zf-00 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:11:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CZyEM-0007vp-00; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 15:11:15 -0600 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CZyEF-0007vj-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 15:11:07 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CZyEC-0004cL-69 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 15:11:04 -0600 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7112C3A0050 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:11:02 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CZyE8-0005M2-00 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:11:00 +0100 Original-Received: from lumberjack.physik.uni-ulm.de ([134.60.10.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:11:00 +0100 Original-Received: from Reiner.Steib by lumberjack.physik.uni-ulm.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:11:00 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 32 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lumberjack.physik.uni-ulm.de X-Face: P05mdcZT&lL[-s2=mw~RsllZ0zZAb?vdE}.s Modified: ChangeLog gnus.texi > > replaced @file{spam.el} with @code{spam.el} everywhere for consistency. [...] > -The idea behind @file{spam.el} is to have a control center for spam detection > -and filtering in Gnus. To that end, @file{spam.el} does two things: it > +The idea behind @code{spam.el} is to have a control center for spam detection > +and filtering in Gnus. To that end, @code{spam.el} does two things: it > filters new mail, and it analyzes mail known to be spam or ham. > -@dfn{Ham} is the name used throughout @file{spam.el} to indicate > +@dfn{Ham} is the name used throughout @code{spam.el} to indicate > non-spam messages. I don't understand these changes. (info "(texinfo)file") says to use @file for filenames. @code is more general. It is correct that the current usage is not consistent. We have (after your change): 67 matches for "@file{[^}]*\.el}" in buffer: gnus.texi 43 matches for "@code{[^}]*\.el}" in buffer: gnus.texi IMO, we should rather fix those 43 occurances of @code{*.el} instead of removing the correctly formated @file{*.el} entries. Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/