Re: In-Reply-To lost when going via drafts?

[Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de>]

On Thu, Apr 17 2003, Simon Josefsson wrote:

> I sent one message to myself, and replied to it directly in the
> summary buffer, and then also replied to the original message and
> saved the reply to the drafts folder, entered the drafts folder and D
> E'd the message and sent the reply.  The latter message doesn't
> contain a In-Reply-To whereas the former does.  Is this intentional?

IMHO, this is a bug.

> I recall some changes to the drafts handling recently, but I didn't
> follow that thread closely.

The changes were done in December or January, IIRC.  Two weeks ago
[1], I suggested to change the default of
`message-generate-headers-first' to '(references) unless somebody
implements a proper solution.

Adding In-Reply-To to `message-generate-headers-first' doesn't seem to
fix the problem you described, though.

Bye, Reiner.

[1] See <news:m3y92vlz10.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> (and parents) or
<URL:http://news.gmane.org/onethread.php?group=gmane.emacs.gnus.general&
root=%3Cv9r88n1bh0.fsf%40marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de%3E>.
-- 
       ,,,
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- PGP key available via WWW   http://rsteib.home.pages.de/