From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/51568 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: In-Reply-To lost when going via drafts? Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:51:37 +0200 Organization: Dept. of Theoretical Physics, University of Ulm Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: Reply-To: reiner.steib@gmx.de NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1050591348 17299 80.91.224.249 (17 Apr 2003 14:55:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M112@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Apr 17 16:55:35 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 196AnW-0004Tm-00 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:55:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 196Any-00072x-00; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 196Anu-00072s-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:55:58 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 40049 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2003 14:55:57 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 40044 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2003 14:55:57 -0000 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (80.91.224.249) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 17 Apr 2003 14:55:57 -0000 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 196An8-0004RB-00 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:55:10 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 196Alo-0004IT-00 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:53:48 +0200 Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org X-Face: .*T0'iU(sujq_j9\J>-d4fg;N/1++U#U$_5ii6k.=|"-n'?5O:Hyz&wi'-!I~,}7~GgT=0S /&-R5sbkNy5+Xo1y{Tw2KKxi@Xh"g@]Qc|.U<*]WDd)qvGowFDvfU1F]{EDho:7P0@|oOD=Bc{K4?> WP68K[Mx:}=`ZT'6g4'f+g?;`vri2!)xGy}3:=l'(/Cea0l4lo^H5#@/Z3ev Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ozFjF2wcn9leuasJuebzDxYlyDE= Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:51568 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:51568 On Thu, Apr 17 2003, Simon Josefsson wrote: > I sent one message to myself, and replied to it directly in the > summary buffer, and then also replied to the original message and > saved the reply to the drafts folder, entered the drafts folder and D > E'd the message and sent the reply. The latter message doesn't > contain a In-Reply-To whereas the former does. Is this intentional? IMHO, this is a bug. > I recall some changes to the drafts handling recently, but I didn't > follow that thread closely. The changes were done in December or January, IIRC. Two weeks ago [1], I suggested to change the default of `message-generate-headers-first' to '(references) unless somebody implements a proper solution. Adding In-Reply-To to `message-generate-headers-first' doesn't seem to fix the problem you described, though. Bye, Reiner. [1] See (and parents) or . -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- PGP key available via WWW http://rsteib.home.pages.de/