From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/56541 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Scoring examples (was: [Q]: How good is gmane for you ?) Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 10:37:10 +0100 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1078397574 7330 80.91.224.253 (4 Mar 2004 10:52:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:52:54 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M5082@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Mar 04 11:52:47 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AyqT9-0003gy-00 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 11:52:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AyqRH-00047l-00; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 04:50:51 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AyqRB-00047g-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 04:50:45 -0600 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089EF3A0223 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 04:50:45 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AyqR9-0002gZ-00 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 11:50:43 +0100 Original-Received: from dialin-145-254-251-053.arcor-ip.net ([145.254.251.53]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu Mar 4 10:50:43 2004 Original-Received: from reiner.steib by dialin-145-254-251-053.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu Mar 4 10:50:43 2004 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 34 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dialin-145-254-251-053.arcor-ip.net X-Face: :6KQZ[nyoS_edmB.%gw-=)BYth^|2+Y+^cu%I$FSx!&>-'om>3H7A|M&n(V7fIo3P.;yo.b yq4$p;ZaBtkv)\}biaiBQe"mD}iib1AA@99-fZ7i*bLhNRVC&0Wkxg9)SH?oWc@{ Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:OJKsQMMR/PWD5AcloCQh0mizZEc= Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56541 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56541 On Wed, Mar 03 2004, Simon Josefsson wrote: > (("xref" > ("gmane.spam.detected" -1000 nil s)) [...] > (mark-and-expunge -100)) Does this setup already reject the spammy articles at XOVER level? Or will the headers or even the article be downloaded nevertheless? I use leafnode2 with this filter rule [1]. I the above rule does the same, we should add it to the examples in the Gnus manual. BTW, didn't we previously have a section "Scoring Examples" (or similar) in the manual? Maybe it was in the old Gnus FAQ? Maybe we should add some of the (old) examples and new ones to (info "(gnus)Scoring Tips") or into a separate node. Bye, Reiner. [1] ,----[ etc/leafnode/filters.example ] | ### Do not fetch articles that Gmane considered spam (only effective in | ### groups of the gmane hierarchy). Note that filtering on "Xref" | ### already filters at XOVER level, see section EFFICIENCY in | ### filterfile(8). | newsgroups = gmane\..* | pattern = ^Xref:.* gmane\.spam\.detected: | action = kill `---- -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- PGP key available via WWW http://rsteib.home.pages.de/