From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/59322 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: encrypt.el Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 23:12:38 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4n7jpu4o7d.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4nis9baoz3.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4nfz4f94jw.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <4n4qkrvrwu.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4nsm87vrgk.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4nr7m9j1ah.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101944801 30320 80.91.229.6 (1 Dec 2004 23:46:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:46:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 02 00:46:35 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CZeB8-0001FV-00 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 00:46:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CZeKd-0001dq-NR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:56:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CZeKV-0001da-Qe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:56:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CZeKV-0001dO-Cn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:56:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CZeKV-0001dL-9l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:56:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [134.60.1.1] (helo=mail-new.rz.uni-ulm.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CZeAp-0005L6-Qi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:46:16 -0500 Original-Received: from lumberjack.physik.uni-ulm.de (lumberjack.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.10.173]) by mail.uni-ulm.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iB1NkAnB004577; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 00:46:10 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from me (lumberjack.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.10.173]) by lumberjack.physik.uni-ulm.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 444BF18162; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 00:46:09 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: (nullmailer pid 1384 invoked by uid 170); Wed, 01 Dec 2004 22:12:40 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org, ding@gnus.org Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Face: .*T0'iU(sujq_j9\J>-d4fg; N/1++U#U$_5ii6k.=|"-n'?5O:Hyz&wi'-!I~,}7~GgT=0S /&-R5sbkNy5+Xo1y{Tw2KKxi@Xh"g@]Qc|.U<*]WDd)qvGowFDvfU1F]{EDho:7P0@|oOD=Bc{K4?> WP68K[Mx:}=`ZT'6g4'f+g?;`vri2!)xGy}3:=l'(/Cea0l4lo^H5#@/Z3ev In-Reply-To: <4nr7m9j1ah.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Wed, 01 Dec 2004 13:55:50 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-POboxes-Metrics: gemini 1297; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30593 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59322 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59322 On Wed, Dec 01 2004, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > I need to clarify, however, how encrypt.el will coexist with the > Gnus version. Should I remove encrypt.el from Gnus, or leave it in > as a duplicate of the Emacs tree version? [I think you mean Gnus repository here, right?] No Gnus is supposed to run on Emacs 21.1 (and up) and XEmacs 21.4 (and up). Wouldn't removing encrypt.el break running Gnus on versions before Emacs 21.4? Bye, Reiner. [ Cc-ing Ding, trimming xemacs-beta ] -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/