From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/65768 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: "Really reply by mail to article author" for gmane groups Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:20:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195942893 32016 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2007 22:21:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 22:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14264@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Nov 24 23:21:39 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Iw3NY-0008J2-UF for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:21:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Iw3N9-0007Kf-Qq; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:21:11 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Iw3N8-0007KQ-Hj for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:21:10 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Iw3N2-0005Yq-9z for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:21:10 -0600 Original-Received: from mail.uni-ulm.de ([134.60.1.11]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Iw3My-0004VN-00 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:21:00 +0100 Original-Received: from bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.41.37]) by mail.uni-ulm.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAOML26B024535; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:21:02 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from localhost (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.41.37]) by bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D8112D7E; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:21:02 +0100 (CET) X-Face: 3Phac&+dw=IZHjhua]bp}LH<*p{qzj8u+ Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65768 Archived-At: On Mon, Nov 12 2007, Reiner Steib wrote: > The rationale for the current default is that if the user is a novice > and not a Gnus expert (see the doc string of `gnus-expert-user'), he > should be warned. This sounds plausible. But I'm not sure if using > `S W' in Gmane groups has been considered there. Probably the default > should be nil for (very) wide replies. What do people think? I have installed the following change in Gnus trunk: --- gnus-msg.el 12 Nov 2007 19:36:53 +0100 7.61 +++ gnus-msg.el 24 Nov 2007 23:19:20 +0100 @@ -1101,7 +1101,10 @@ ((functionp gnus-confirm-mail-reply-to-news) (funcall gnus-confirm-mail-reply-to-news gnus-newsgroup-name)) (t gnus-confirm-mail-reply-to-news))) - (y-or-n-p "Really reply by mail to article author? ")) + (if (or wide very-wide) + t ;; Ignore gnus-confirm-mail-reply-to-news for wide and very + ;; wide replies. + (y-or-n-p "Really reply by mail to article author? ")))) (let* ((article (if (listp (car yank)) (caar yank) Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/