From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/61326 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-article-sort-*-reverse Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:03:46 +0100 Organization: Dept. of Theoretical Physics, University of Ulm Message-ID: References: <20051029073128.PUFY9722.fep32-app.kolumbus.fi@cante.net> <87ek5zkbtj.fsf@uwo.ca> <45943.80.217.219.208.1130921646.squirrel@yxa.extundo.com> <87u0enjg7e.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1131470632 25879 80.91.229.2 (8 Nov 2005 17:23:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+m9858@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Nov 08 18:23:51 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EZX8i-0003YC-7X for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:20:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EZX8V-0007Aj-00; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 11:19:55 -0600 Original-Received: from nas02.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.40]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EZX4Q-0007Ab-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 11:15:42 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas02.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EZX4J-0007uo-9J for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 11:15:42 -0600 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EZX4H-0004XQ-00 for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:15:33 +0100 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EZWyT-0007nQ-5W for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:09:33 +0100 Original-Received: from bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de ([134.60.10.123]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:09:33 +0100 Original-Received: from Reiner.Steib by bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:09:33 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de X-Face: P05mdcZT&lL[-s2=mw~RsllZ0zZAb?vdE}.s On Tue, Nov 08 2005, Romain Francoise wrote: > Reiner Steib writes: > >> I don't see convincing arguments for gnus-article-sort-*-reverse >> functions. I'd vote for removing `gnus-article-sort-by-date-reverse'. > > I'd vote against removing it: I've had such a function in my local > config for years, and I think it's useful. What's wrong with `(not gnus-article-sort-by-date)' or `C-u C-c C-s C-d' (`C-u M-x gnus-summary-sort-by-date RET')? *If* gnus-article-sort-*-reverse would make sense, *-reverse should be *provided for all gnus-article-sort-* functions. Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/