Re: No newline at the end of the article with broken MIME message

Re: No newline at the end of the article with broken MIME message

[Reiner Steib]

On Wed, Jun 14 2006, Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:

> I found the MIME messages[1] in the emacs-devel list that seem
> to have been broken.  Because there is no empty line between the
> contents of the last part and the last boundary delimiter line
> in those messages, Gnus shows them in the article buffer without
> terminating with a newline.  Although that might be indeed a
> right behavior[2], I've modified `gnus-display-mime' so that it
> might necessarily terminate an article with a newline.
>
> [1]
> <D27FF599-E025-4E3A-88CD-9A1E59890340@alastairs-place.net>
> <11C41C60-9F2B-418C-AD88-B9EA96CAD537@alastairs-place.net>
> <83A6DECE-2D65-4449-95E0-0C40AFFA30A7@alastairs-place.net>
>
> [2]
> RFC2046: 5.1.1. Common Syntax
> [...]
>    NOTE:  The CRLF preceding the boundary delimiter line is conceptually
>    attached to the boundary so that it is possible to have a part that
>    does not end with a CRLF (line  break).  Body parts that must be
>    considered to end with line breaks, therefore, must have two CRLFs
>    preceding the boundary delimiter line, the first of which is part of
>    the preceding body part, and the second of which is part of the
>    encapsulation boundary.

IMHO it would be good to post messages like this[1] to ding as well[2]
because it's by far more convenient to find an article in the archive
of gmane.emacs.gnus.general on Gmane than in gnus.gnus-bug.  WDYT?

Bye, Reiner.

[1] Or e.g. <news:b4mmzck8quc.fsf@jpl.org>

[2] Either only to ding or cc-ing ding.
-- 
       ,,,
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo---  |  PGP key available  |  http://rsteib.home.pages.de/

Re: No newline at the end of the article with broken MIME message

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

>>>>> In <v9k67knhga.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de>
>>>>>	Reiner Steib wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 14 2006, Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:

>> I found the MIME messages[1] in the emacs-devel list that seem
>> to have been broken.

[...]

> IMHO it would be good to post messages like this[1] to ding as well[2]
> because it's by far more convenient to find an article in the archive
> of gmane.emacs.gnus.general on Gmane than in gnus.gnus-bug.  WDYT?

> Bye, Reiner.

> [1] Or e.g. <news:b4mmzck8quc.fsf@jpl.org>

> [2] Either only to ding or cc-ing ding.

I agree.  Though I thought that such a trivial issue was not
worth posting to the ding list, who judges whether it is
important or not will probably be the audience. :)