From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66679 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.discuss,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Slow Access from Gnus Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:19:21 +0200 Message-ID: References: <76abkahc6i.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <87r6dmobkp.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <76sky2fksc.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <877ifdhip3.fsf@dod.no> <76d4p5g22s.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1207322505 17757 80.91.229.12 (4 Apr 2008 15:21:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:21:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: gmane-discuss@hawk.netfonds.no, ding@gnus.org To: Jake Colman Original-X-From: gmane-discuss-bounces@hawk.netfonds.no Fri Apr 04 17:22:08 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gd-gmane-discuss@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from hawk.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.246]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jhnja-0006Ko-6g for gd-gmane-discuss@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:21:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=hawk.netfonds.no) by hawk.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Jhnj6-0003ix-00; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:21:12 +0200 Original-Received: from mail.uni-ulm.de ([134.60.1.11]) by hawk.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Jhnj4-0003is-00 for ; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:21:10 +0200 Original-Received: from bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.41.37]) by mail.uni-ulm.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m34FL15K012204; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:21:01 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from localhost (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.41.37]) by bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EBB12FB5; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:20:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Face: mtjf/D:es1T0wHO:&CJ'ZXe"l; 3C--rw\z!{`eFwL){|]RpI+4{u25L=5C /0>KuGeTsk<~<&NE-AKV1560e!+RJeyWmSskkrJm?[vUV#66{T_m|Ae<||Ku#Mk5`y&O`n~z2; n8eP J5#2h@2eQgV@E70IY_0WlEx!"&giy{+\%h1LJox$zv@/l%ZmU4^tZA>xQpnkUBVC5.jpg#0'(+2?Rs )NAr:>3<=WxHE$ktbLysDIM5TbmHu*3, ding@gnus.org, gmane-discuss@hawk.netfonds.no In-Reply-To: <76d4p5g22s.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> (Jake Colman's message of "Fri, 04 Apr 2008 09:51:55 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-CollegeOfNewCaledonia-Metrics: poseidon 1189; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-BeenThere: gmane-discuss@hawk.netfonds.no X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: gmane-discuss.hawk.netfonds.no List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: gmane-discuss-bounces@hawk.netfonds.no Errors-To: gmane-discuss-bounces@hawk.netfonds.no Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.discuss:11607 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66679 Archived-At: On Fri, Apr 04 2008, Jake Colman wrote: >>>>>> "SB" == Steinar Bang writes: > SB> Have you tried sniffing the group opening with eg. wireshark to > SB> see if the delay is simply network related? > > When I enter a traditional nntp-based newsgroup (e.g., comp.emacs.help) > I see some quick 'nntp read' messages and then I'm in. Depending on the > number of messages that have been posted since the last time I entered > the newsgroup, I will see more or less 'nntp read' messages. > > But when I entered gmane.discuss just now, with only two messages posted > since I last checked it yesterday, I still saw a huge amount of 'nntp > read' traffic. It's almost as if Gnus is downloading the entire group > and doesn't know how much I've already seen. Set nntp-record-commands to t and check if the commands in the *nntp-log* buffer are significantly different e.g. for gnu.emacs.help and gmane.emacs.help. Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/