From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/64505 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Top posting related changes in the cvs Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:49:52 +0200 Message-ID: References: <873b3hm942.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87ps6ljc3q.fsf@ambire.localdomain> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1176165210 15095 80.91.229.12 (10 Apr 2007 00:33:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 00:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Gabor Z. Papp" , Thien-Thi Nguyen , ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Katsumi Yamaoka Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 10 02:32:45 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HaztE-0001G8-OY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:51:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hazx4-0005Vt-RY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:54:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hazwz-0005Ol-VA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:54:54 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hazwy-0005Nl-3L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:54:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hazwx-0005Ni-Tm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:54:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.uni-ulm.de ([134.60.1.11]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hazt5-00071f-U7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:50:52 -0400 Original-Received: from bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.10.123]) by mail.uni-ulm.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l39Jol1p002534; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 21:50:48 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from localhost (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.10.123]) by bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534F61236D; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 21:50:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Face: 1; h7XMU[7l}$T@J.D}5z*w8Tg'}B5ArAWc8>2X~otB; kOjKs8X%|hTC#dG:%Vpx")x7S/`v :VXU#fZW$X$zdhEU.RfVQ@<-m9IuN{Hm"fW{,5]6kR'M*vEs+{5Cj!L(JTRzA$(},?5J=sm; %Od, Thien-Thi Nguyen , "Gabor Z. Papp" , ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Katsumi Yamaoka's message of "Mon\, 09 Apr 2007 15\:40\:40 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.97 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-sonic.net-Metrics: arktur 1117; Body=5 Fuz1=5 Fuz2=5 X-detected-kernel: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69240 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:64505 Archived-At: On Mon, Apr 09 2007, Katsumi Yamaoka wrote: >>>>>> In <873b3hm942.fsf@ambire.localdomain> Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote: >> * gnus-msg.el (gnus-inews-yank-articles): >> Fix bug: Make sure point is at eob after yanking. > >> probably all callers of `message-yank-original' should be checked. >> does that give good results? > > I think the recent change in `message-yank-original' and this > fix are the right solutions for Gnus v5.11. [...] > [6. patch for Gnus v5.11 --- text/plain; patch-for-Gnus-v5_11.txt] I'm not sure if I understand correctly. Are you saying we need this patch in addition to the current code in Emacs (i.e. Gnus v5.11; lisp/gnus/message.el rev. 1.117)? If so, we should install it ASAP so that it gets more testing before and during the next (final?) pretest. Are you sure about the use of `(insert ?\n)' vs. `(newline)', i.e. soft or hard newline? (I'm not sure; that's why I ask. :-)) ,----[ f newline RET ] | newline is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `simple'. | It is bound to RET. | (newline &optional arg) | | Insert a newline, and move to left margin of the new line if it's blank. | If `use-hard-newlines' is non-nil, the newline is marked with the | text-property `hard'. | With arg, insert that many newlines. | Call `auto-fill-function' if the current column number is greater | than the value of `fill-column' and arg is nil. `---- Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/