From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/61872 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam manual update for Gnus Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 23:49:15 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87k6ccjgzr.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4nbqxkmh39.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ek2g8cld.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4nirrsgrfc.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139270877 25075 80.91.229.2 (7 Feb 2006 00:07:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 00:07:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m10401@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Feb 07 01:07:54 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F6GOZ-0003uQ-Sf for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 01:07:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1F6GOV-0003XE-00; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 18:07:43 -0600 Original-Received: from nas01.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.39]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1F6GKF-0003X9-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 18:03:19 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas01.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F6GKB-0001fH-OL for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 18:03:19 -0600 Original-Received: from mail.uni-ulm.de ([134.60.1.1]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1F6GKA-0007Dl-00 for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 01:03:14 +0100 Original-Received: from bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.10.123]) by mail.uni-ulm.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k17037p9013845; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 01:03:08 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from viandante.physik.uni-ulm.de (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.10.123]) by bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E3C711102; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 01:03:03 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: (nullmailer pid 12732 invoked by uid 170); Mon, 06 Feb 2006 22:49:15 -0000 Original-To: Chong Yidong Mail-Followup-To: "Chong Yidong" , ding@gnus.org X-Face: 3Phac&+dw=IZHjhua]bp}LH<*p{qzj8u+ On Mon, Feb 06 2006, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > I see the problem, I am using the Ding CVS, and you are using the > Emacs CVS. Ted, if you don't want to check out Emacs CVS, you can use the v5-10 branch in Gnus' CVS. > What's the right approach here? I would guess we should make the > changes in both places, but start with Ding. Do you agree? The spam.el (and spam-report.el) code differs between the Gnus CVS trunk and the v5-10 branch (which is synced to/from Emacs CVS). I think that in the v5-10 branch there is some inconsistency between code and documentation, see . I didn't have time to dig into it, though. (I already mentioned this in a previous mail to Chong) (I didn't look at the patch yet. But...) I'd guess that we should start from v5-10/Emacs CVS and update to the new code in the trunk later. Assuming that the next Emacs release is more close than the next stable Gnus release. > Is anyone willing to help me and Chong proofread? I'd like to; but I can't promise when. But I only have practical experience with the (quite unusual) setup described in (info "(gnus)Spam ELisp Package Configuration Examples"). It would be good if some "ordinary users" (the less you know about the internals, the better. ;-)) could help proofreading. Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/