From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66273 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Problems with gnus-registry Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:29:59 +0100 Message-ID: References: <76sl0vma5q.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86k5loxulw.fsf@lifelogs.com> <76tzkoq1t4.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <868x20wi2a.fsf@lifelogs.com> <76y7a0nyo3.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86lk60uwwq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <764pconmz4.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86abmfv3ig.fsf@lifelogs.com> <767ihjm5qn.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86myqfoxrv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <76y79zkpnx.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <868x1yp3lr.fsf@lifelogs.com> <86odasai1l.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202405564 4955 80.91.229.12 (7 Feb 2008 17:32:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:32:44 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14764@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Feb 07 18:33:06 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JNAcN-0003LX-VN for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:33:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JNAaf-0006uu-0Q; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:31:13 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JNAad-0006ue-Iy for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:31:11 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JNAaX-00042l-5g for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:31:11 -0600 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1JNAaa-0006Ne-00 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:31:08 +0100 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JNAaT-0006XA-5V for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: from p54a95781.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.169.87.129]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: from Reiner.Steib by p54a95781.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:31:01 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 43 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p54a95781.dip.t-dialin.net X-Face: /U7=m^"/-Dn61mAl{g9e3>\G5Tp,oEX|V)g2I1hBk\ML;)7A?6cmB-y7y?'NA^J<=oz7syB =(McAwIHgLX!.B?R3X}98d@?>CrT094KLWh]WU4gDpnL/")MS(XoQTv`Oq225uL>+;CpPXo$N5e>N> $tPd-gbB^F{gQS#1ase]XO~D4p4M"3+F-7~u]dy3I?Pb8RO*H-EFeWDUf?Rf,d]pv\Jvh2Cht!A=im yKAS2Z%Ao^;}W/qzMvMm Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:HGy4dD2I6qszN/B0xN7TUJfr700= X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66273 Archived-At: On Thu, Feb 07 2008, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:05:26 +0100 Reiner Steib wrote: > RS> IMHO, something with "-ignore-"/"-ignored-" would be a better name for > RS> consistency with many other Gnus variable including > RS> `nnmail-split-fancy-with-parent-ignore-groups' and > RS> `nnmail-cache-ignore-groups'. > > There's two variables: [...] > ;; The Gnus registry's ignored groups > (gnus-define-group-parameter > registry-ignore > :type list > :function-document > "Whether this group should be ignored by the registry." > :variable gnus-registry-ignored-groups [...] > "*Groups in which the registry should be turned off." [...] > (defcustom gnus-registry-unfollowed-groups '("delayed$" "drafts$" "queue$" "INBOX$") > "List of groups that gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent won't return. [...] > They are used differently. Ignored groups are not saved in the > registry, but they are followed for splitting (this is incorrect, I > think). Unfollowed groups are not followed by > gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent function but they are saved. > > I think the two should be united in one variable, specifically > gnus-registry-ignored-groups since it's more powerful and should do the > same thing. As we want to store marks (or "labels") in the registry, wouldn't it make sense to have two different variables? (Though both should/could contain "ignore" in the name, like the related nnmail-* variables.) A user might want to ignore some groups for parent splitting, but want to set marks in these groups. Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/