From: Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de>
Subject: Spam processing slows down group exit (was: Profiling)
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 14:51:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <v9pte3u68w.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3u13j3qiq.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
On Tue, Dec 30 2003, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Gnus was feeling a bit more sluggish than usual, so I've spent a
> couple of hours profiling and fixing obvious things.
I noticed that leaving large nntp or nnml groups became kinda slow (I
didn't profile it, though).
I found that the group and topic parameters (spam/ham) are
calculated[1] for *every article* rather than once for each group
exit. I have set up spam processing for some IMAP groups and all
Gmane groups[2], but not for nnml (and other nntp groups).
I added the following debug statements in `spam-group-ham-mark-p'...
(gnus-message 9 "DEBUG: spam-group-ham-mark-p %s %s %s" group mark spam)
... and got the following output after leaving a group with 10
articles (entered with `10 RET'):
,----
| Exiting summary buffer and applying spam rules
| DEBUG: spam-group-ham-mark-p nnml+foo:bar 69 t [9 times]
| DEBUG: spam-group-ham-mark-p nnml+foo:bar 33 t
| DEBUG: spam-group-ham-mark-p nnml+foo:bar 69 nil [9 times]
| DEBUG: spam-group-ham-mark-p nnml+foo:bar 33 nil
| Marking spam as expired without moving it
`----
The function seems to be called from `spam-ham-copy-or-move-routine':
(dolist (article articles)
(when (spam-group-ham-mark-p gnus-newsgroup-name
(gnus-summary-article-mark article))
(push article todo)))
Couldn't each possible mark be checked _once_ per group exit instead
once for every article? (==> O(1) instead of O(n), AFAIKS.)
Why is `spam-ham-copy-or-move-routine' called in the first place? I
have not requested any spam processing in this group.
Bye, Reiner.
[1] Using C-g after toggle-debug-on-quit, I saw that Gnus was doing
this most of the time.
[2] See also <news:v94qw3y46d.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de>:
("nnimap:spam\\.detected"
(gnus-article-sort-functions '(gnus-article-sort-by-chars))
(ham-process-destination "nnimap:INBOX" "nnimap:training.ham")
(spam-contents gnus-group-spam-classification-spam))
("nnimap:\\(INBOX\\|other-folders\\)"
(spam-process-destination . "nnimap:training.spam")
(spam-contents gnus-group-spam-classification-ham))
("^gmane\\."
(spam-process (gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-report-gmane)))
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- PGP key available via WWW http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-01 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-30 3:58 Profiling Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-12-30 5:06 ` Profiling Kevin Greiner
2003-12-31 1:39 ` Profiling Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2004-01-04 15:37 ` Profiling Per Abrahamsen
2004-01-04 20:41 ` Profiling Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-12-31 1:49 ` Profiling Michael Cook
2004-01-03 16:56 ` Profiling Robert Marshall
2004-01-01 13:51 ` Reiner Steib [this message]
2004-01-02 16:08 ` Spam processing slows down group exit Ted Zlatanov
2004-01-02 18:40 ` Reiner Steib
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=v9pte3u68w.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de \
--to=4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de \
--cc=reiner.steib@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).