From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/55474 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Spam processing slows down group exit Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 19:40:55 +0100 Organization: Dept. of Theoretical Physics, University of Ulm Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <4nznd6jptc.fsf@collins.bwh.harvard.edu> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1073069434 4641 80.91.224.253 (2 Jan 2004 18:50:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 18:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M4014@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Jan 02 19:50:32 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AcUNU-0007cR-00 for ; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 19:50:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AcUNK-0003G8-00; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 12:50:22 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AcUNG-0003G3-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 12:50:18 -0600 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8123A0062 for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 12:50:17 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AcUNF-0003o2-00 for ; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 19:50:17 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AcUEH-0003h0-00 for ; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 19:41:01 +0100 Original-Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AcUEH-0000sc-00 for ; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 19:41:01 +0100 Original-Lines: 31 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Face: .*T0'iU(sujq_j9\J>-d4fg;N/1++U#U$_5ii6k.=|"-n'?5O:Hyz&wi'-!I~,}7~GgT=0S /&-R5sbkNy5+Xo1y{Tw2KKxi@Xh"g@]Qc|.U<*]WDd)qvGowFDvfU1F]{EDho:7P0@|oOD=Bc{K4?> WP68K[Mx:}=`ZT'6g4'f+g?;`vri2!)xGy}3:=l'(/Cea0l4lo^H5#@/Z3ev Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.1004 (Gnus v5.10.4) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:VGjLbdCwpK+m9Ze9ESh81UolG7Y= Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55474 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55474 On Fri, Jan 02 2004, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > On Thu, 01 Jan 2004, 4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de wrote: > >> I found that the group and topic parameters (spam/ham) are >> calculated[1] for *every article* rather than once for each group >> exit. [...] > Fixed in CVS, take a look. Thanks. It's fine now. > I didn't bother with a global cache, because it would be much > optimizing for a small gain, Yes, I agree. >> Why is `spam-ham-copy-or-move-routine' called in the first place? I >> have not requested any spam processing in this group. > > It's called from spam-summary-prepare-exit, can you check why it's > being invoked in your case in particular? It should only be called > here (through the spam-ham-{copy,move}-routine proxies): It seems it isn't called anymore with your change. Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- PGP key available via WWW http://rsteib.home.pages.de/