Hi,

the attached patch makes the following functions in `deuglify.el'
interactive and adds appropriate menu entries and key bindings.
Additions for texi/gnus.texi are included.

Some questions/remarks related to this:

Is there a convention, that such function names should start with
`gnus-article-'?  Then they should be renamed (`gnus-outlook-' -->
`gnus-article-outlook-').

It's very hard to find unoccupied bindings, so I choose `W Y' (`y' as
in deuglif*y*) as a prefix:

`W Y u' gnus-outlook-unwrap-lines
`W Y a' gnus-outlook-repair-attribution
`W Y c' gnus-outlook-rearrange-citation
`W Y f' gnus-article-outlook-deuglify-article (*f*ull deuglify)

One could use `W Y k' -- outloo*k* deuglif*y* -- as in `W k' instead
of `W Y f'.

IMHO, the old `W k' binding should be removed (we have `W Y f' or `W Y
k' instead), because there are not many keys left.  But maybe to many
people will complain.  Opinions?

lisp/ChangeLog:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
2003-01-10  Reiner Steib  <Reiner.Steib@gmx.de>

	* deuglify.el (gnus-outlook-deuglify-attrib-verb-regexp): Added
	castellano.
	(gnus-outlook-display-hook): New variable.
	(gnus-outlook-display-article-buffer): New function.
	(gnus-outlook-unwrap-lines, gnus-outlook-repair-attribution)
	(gnus-outlook-deuglify-article): Made them interactive and added
	optional arg.  Use `g-o-d-a-b'.
	(gnus-article-outlook-deuglify-article): Use `g-o-d-a-b'.

	* gnus-sum.el: Added autoloads.
	(gnus-summary-mode-map): Added gnus-summary-wash-deuglify-map.
	(gnus-summary-make-menu-bar): Added "(Outlook) Deuglify" menu.

--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

texi/ChangeLog:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
2003-01-10  Reiner Steib  <Reiner.Steib@gmx.de>

	* gnus.texi (Article Washing): Added gnus-outlook-unwrap-lines,
	gnus-outlook-repair-attribution, gnus-outlook-rearrange-citation.

--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---