Re: spam.el binds too many keys to `gnus-summary-mark-as-spam'

[Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc>]

On Tue, Apr 01 2008, Johan Bockgård wrote:

> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
>> I think those keys were chosen by consensus because several people
>> liked different bindings.  

If we'd use this policy ("several people like different bindings"), we
will end up with no available bindings very soon.

>> I think `S x' should be the default, and Mst/Msx/M-d should go
>> away, but I really don't have strong feelings for any of those key
>> bindings.  I use C-s personally, FWIW, because it's such a useful
>> operation.

Thinking more about it, I think that the `S ...' bindings are
completely misplaced.  All other `S ...' are replying/posting related.

| (gnus-define-keys gnus-summary-mode-map
|   "St" spam-generic-score
|   "Sx" gnus-summary-mark-as-spam
|   "Mst" spam-generic-score
|   "Msx" gnus-summary-mark-as-spam
|   "\M-d" gnus-summary-mark-as-spam)

> I use $.

Me too.  ;-)

But I'm talking about the default key bindings which also occupy
bindings for users not using `spam.el' at all.

Bye, Reiner.
-- 
       ,,,
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo---  |  PGP key available  |  http://rsteib.home.pages.de/