From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66853 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam.el binds too many keys to `gnus-summary-mark-as-spam' Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:32:05 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86ve33q91m.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208704202 17836 80.91.229.12 (20 Apr 2008 15:10:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:10:02 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M15335@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Apr 20 17:10:37 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JnbBa-0002qb-92 for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:10:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JnbA1-0003RG-O7; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:08:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JnbA0-0003Qs-4T for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:08:56 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Jnb9t-0003mr-JS for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:08:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.uni-ulm.de ([134.60.1.11]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1JnbA4-0000Vl-00 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:09:00 +0200 Original-Received: from bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.41.37]) by mail.uni-ulm.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m3KF8lSM013157 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:08:47 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from localhost (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.41.37]) by bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D6A1C629 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:08:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Face: #vK]N[`vqjuod*|)'[iD7/"3AB-ApT%fmN"LWAg@oS7OesGv~)n[OBTLM#I="J'Y^-7I I/ps7o_'IK@#-Rs{::DZ@O8yS|fexe,XslY[:dNWOb~>?mC-&i_c)say:"\IpA.5U.b]'NY;Pks{lb h.+#6%DpZuaK3dcHB`Av3zc:r!C%~s0&m,tWj]&},qg.+0ww2gK%f!:GK|wMl.I!(voY*1"^li8"~B BNG)9LvPi?^DMR-GVDnZqhu*3Hi,+g=wFhI)BL6&u{EOVEHjVEVq~d?_}lMntWAc3(6?kftjc>_f>! g0wM(qPM$d5]^TT_Qyi&L?LGVG)SHN;Gk/,pkY9,~ Mail-Followup-To: Gnus User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-Rhyolite-Metrics: poseidon 104; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail.uni-ulm.de id m3KF8lSM013157 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66853 Archived-At: On Tue, Apr 01 2008, Johan Bockg=E5rd wrote: > Ted Zlatanov writes: >> I think those keys were chosen by consensus because several people >> liked different bindings. =20 If we'd use this policy ("several people like different bindings"), we will end up with no available bindings very soon. >> I think `S x' should be the default, and Mst/Msx/M-d should go >> away, but I really don't have strong feelings for any of those key >> bindings. I use C-s personally, FWIW, because it's such a useful >> operation. Thinking more about it, I think that the `S ...' bindings are completely misplaced. All other `S ...' are replying/posting related. | (gnus-define-keys gnus-summary-mode-map | "St" spam-generic-score | "Sx" gnus-summary-mark-as-spam | "Mst" spam-generic-score | "Msx" gnus-summary-mark-as-spam | "\M-d" gnus-summary-mark-as-spam) > I use $. Me too. ;-) But I'm talking about the default key bindings which also occupy bindings for users not using `spam.el' at all. Bye, Reiner. --=20 ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/