Re: "Really reply by mail to article author" for gmane groups

[Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc>]

On Sat, Nov 24 2007, Reiner Steib wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 12 2007, Reiner Steib wrote:
>> The rationale for the current default is that if the user is a novice
>> and not a Gnus expert (see the doc string of `gnus-expert-user'), he
>> should be warned.  This sounds plausible.  But I'm not sure if using
>> `S W' in Gmane groups has been considered there.  Probably the default
>> should be nil for (very) wide replies.  What do people think?
>
> I have installed the following change in Gnus trunk:
>
> --- gnus-msg.el	12 Nov 2007 19:36:53 +0100	7.61
> +++ gnus-msg.el	24 Nov 2007 23:19:20 +0100	
> @@ -1101,7 +1101,10 @@
>  		       ((functionp gnus-confirm-mail-reply-to-news)
>  			(funcall gnus-confirm-mail-reply-to-news gnus-newsgroup-name))
>  		       (t gnus-confirm-mail-reply-to-news)))
> -	    (y-or-n-p "Really reply by mail to article author? "))
> +	    (if (or wide very-wide)
> +		t ;; Ignore gnus-confirm-mail-reply-to-news for wide and very
> +		  ;; wide replies.
> +	      (y-or-n-p "Really reply by mail to article author? "))))
>      (let* ((article
>  	    (if (listp (car yank))
>  		(caar yank)

Dan, does it solve your problem?  If so, could you please remove the
item from FOR-RELEASE in Emacs?

Bye, Reiner.
-- 
       ,,,
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo---  |  PGP key available  |  http://rsteib.home.pages.de/