From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38852
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: I hate the new indentation in message-mode
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:42:42 +0200
Message-ID: <vaf1yl2p59p.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <muxitehykyq.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
	<vafd74o2xtr.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<shlmjato84.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174652 24740 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:30:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:30:52 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Gnus Beta Testers <ding@gnus.org>
Return-Path: <grossjoh@lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Return-Path: <grossjoh@lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Original-Received: (qmail 11315 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2001 09:43:14 -0000
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (129.217.4.42)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 20 Sep 2001 09:43:14 -0000
Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67])
	by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f8K9glU05664;
	Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:42:47 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80])
	by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id LAA07774; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:42:42 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104)
	id 4537D20B3; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:42:42 +0200 (CEST)
Original-To: Karl Eichwalder <keichwa@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <shlmjato84.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de> (Karl Eichwalder's message
 of "Thu, 20 Sep 2001 07:39:39 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.106
Original-Lines: 20
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38852
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38852

Karl Eichwalder <keichwa@gmx.net> writes:

> Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) writes:
>
>> If enough people want your behavior, maybe a user option could be
>> introduced.
>
> Is this a vote?  I "complained" earlier.  Please, revert to the old
> behavior we've had for years.  Don't force users to press M-i when all
> they want is TAB.

I've now introduced a variable message-tab-body-function.  It defaults
to indent-relative, though.

Maybe the best thing to do is to default to the function that's used
in text mode.  What do you all think?

kai
--=20
Symbol's function definition is void: signature